🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during wider concerns about industry interference with public health regulations. In recent weeks, international health experts issued a warning that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for different infractions “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary states the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the related medical consequences” but claims that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We live in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which allow for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that young individuals should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which includes increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.